Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Simulated Rape is not illegal in the United States. Neither is simulated Child Porn. It’s disgusting if you ask me, but not illegal. It maybe considered obscene in some jurisdictions.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
I’m still waiting for a intensecash sale on my Tube site! Other sites have sold already. 
One question though, how can anyone accept User generated or uploaded content and do so legally? How do you know the age of the person in a video if you have no proper documentation? How do you know what happens in the video is legal?
[quote=abostonboy;43994]I am seeing good numbers from those that promote Intense Cash on tube sites. Of course the ones that drive the most sales are the ones with the most traffic. But, the sales are coming from the video pages, and not random banner clicks.
I really feel that a tube site is the ultimate test of the quality of your product. Unlike a review site that “talks” about a member’s area, a tube site actually gives the surfer a real snapshot of the inside; the content. And it doesn’t have to be full length videos to get an idea of the content. But, let’s be real, how many sites can a member preview 20 videos from a paysite until they find one that they really like enough to join?
The market for Tube sites is very competitive now. All I was saying in my original post is that I feel offering true amateur uploads would help a tube site more than full length sponsor videos.[/quote]
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
i take it that law that included simulated cp and even toon cp was overturned a while back? i missed that.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Wow. Really? I never knew that. I wonder if it’s the same here in Canada. Yeah, that’s pretty disgusting to say the very least.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
How is role play disgusting? You could say the same thing about BDSM - just 'cause you don’t want your back or balls all red and bloody doesn’t mean it’s not totally hot to someone else… A few guys would probably totally get off on being waterboarded. There’s a huge difference between the real thing and something that’s done in a safe environment. Simulated means IT’S NOT REAL!!!
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
So just where do you draw the line? Simulated Rape & Child Porn is okay, because IT IS NOT REAL? Are you really saying that?
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
About 99,9% of TOP 10 videogames out there are simulating war/fight that involves killing people.
Does it make you a killer in the real life? Nope.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
[quote=InsaneSimon;44048]About 99,9% of TOP 10 videogames out there are simulating war/fight that involves killing people.
Does it make you a killer in the real life? Nope.[/quote]
Good Lord, the comment isn’t about some stupid video game, isn’t about role playing in some BDSM dungeon, the comment by RDude was about the legality of simulated rape and child porn. And frankly that IS disgusting.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Try to apply my example to it. Even killing people is disgusting, but videogames are about that. And people have fun playing them.
It could be the same for SIMULATED cp action, even - i agree on that - if disgusting.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Whatever a couple or group of people do in the comfort of their own home is none of anyone else’s business. Providing no innocent people are hurt. Which includes someone not being overpowered by someone much stronger than they are.
However, where is the line drawn when simulating something as disgusting as child pornography for others to watch? What does this do for the psyche of the viewer? Does it provide a justification for them to go out and find a real child to have sex with? I tend to think so.
Kink is kink, and fetish is fetish. But even someone as kinky as myself cannot justify sex with a child. Meaning: anyone under the age of 18 at least. Of course, I have always liked older men and women anyway.
Just my opinion on it. Keep it in the home as long as it’s all in fun and not real. When it leaves the home, it becomes a problem from the way I see it.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Gay people are disgusting to many people (like my parents). One person’s view of disgusting, even a group of people’s view of disgusting, isn’t sufficient basis to pass a law.
The standard should be 1) was it consensual? and 2) was anyone hurt by it? (in a way not intended by the person who was hurt).
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
[quote=rawTOP;44052]Gay people are disgusting to many people (like my parents). One person’s view of disgusting, even a group of people’s view of disgusting, isn’t sufficient basis to pass a law.
The standard should be 1) was it consensual? and 2) was anyone hurt by it? (in a way not intended by the person who was hurt).[/quote]
A typical ducking of the question, again.
So just where do you draw the line? Simulated Rape & Child Porn is okay, because IT IS NOT REAL? Are you really saying that?
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Not sure, but Aschroft vs. FSC overturned the 1996 ban.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
The Simulated CP case is complex. CPPA of 1996 put severe limitations on the First Amendment, possibly making even a play Romeo and Juliet against the law.
Here is part of the ruling,
“The Court concluded that the “CPPA prohibits speech despite its serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.” In particular, it prohibits the visual depiction of teenagers engaged in sexual activity, a “fact of modern society and has been a theme in art and literature throughout the ages.” Such depictions include performances of Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare; the 1996 film William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet, directed by Baz Luhrmann; and the Academy Award winning movies Traffic and American Beauty. “If these films, or hundreds of others of lesser note that explore those subjects, contain a single graphic depiction of sexual activity within the statutory definition, the possessor of the film would be subject to severe punishment without inquiry into the work’s redeeming value. This is inconsistent with an essential First Amendment rule: The artistic merit of a work does not depend on the presence of a single explicit scene.””
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
I’ll always stick to the bigger picture in stuff like this. It hits on fundamental issues - lose track of those and you can wind up violating people’s basic rights…
I was just thinking in terms of simulated rape when I wrote my initial reaction. Simulated rape is at the heart of a lot of BDSM - it’s hardly evil. But in thinking about it, simulated CP pretty much follows the same lines…
If someone wants to take an 18 y.o. that looks 16, shave his pubes, put him in a playroom with toys for 6 year olds, and film it… Whatever… Frankly, I’m not seeing the difference between that and diaper fetish that’s popular among straight people. It’s not like they go home and want to molest anything that happens to be in a diaper…
I still go back to the fact that when I was 22 I wasn’t ready for porn, yet I was in it, while there are 17 y.o. guys who are ready for it. The law is imperfect and always will be. It’s really about the individuals involved.
Prove to me that watching simulated rape causes you to commit rape or watching simulated CP causes you to become predator, and I may change my mind. But it’s probably more like simulated violence in video games doesn’t cause you to become a killer… I emphasize cause because rapists may like to view simulated rape, killers may like violent video games, but it’s not a causal relationship…
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Mainstream movies have simulated rape scenes. Where an X-rated differs is that in some jurisdictions it maybe considered obscene.
I don’t feel that movie like this reflect healthy sexual behavior that is good for our industry. But, on the other hand, It’s probably safer to the models to film a scene like this with condoms than a bareback scene. I am just not sure that these types of videos reflect positively on our industry.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
[QUOTE=gaydemon;44016]I’m still waiting for a intensecash sale on my Tube site! Other sites have sold already.
One question though, how can anyone accept User generated or uploaded content and do so legally? How do you know the age of the person in a video if you have no proper documentation? How do you know what happens in the video is legal?[/QUOTE]
I am seeing the average BSB video has gotten about 100 views. I can get you some more videos to get the views up.
As far as the legal questions, I am not sure about that one and is one of the reasons that I will probably never open a tube site. I would guess that Tube Sites are taking the ISP approach in their legal arguments. I mean, how does one know that a profile on any adult hookup site is over the age of age?
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
The movie poster for Gone With The Wind depicts the moment when Ret Butler rapes Scarlett O’Hara…
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
Simulated CP could be Romeo and Juliet.
Re: Is giving away full length video a new trend to make surfers happy?
First off, I didn’t read anything in Rawtop’s post that implied that he supports simulated CP. He spoke to BDSM fantasy, which often includes fantasies involving control and lack of consent and so forth.
My inference from what he said was that he’s speaking to the bigger issue, which is the right of people to freely express themselves, and he actually clarified that position in a later post.
I’m a little surprised that people who work in the adult industry are taking such strong positions. I’m pretty vehemently opposed to rape and to CP, and as far as my personal tastes, content that portrays rape or CP, even in a fantasy setting, isn’t conveying positive, healthy things, and I wish there wasn’t demand, and that people didn’t fulfill that demand.
As far as CP, I do believe that laws banning simulated CP are a good thing, and I can see a pretty clear argument as to why limiting speech as it relates to simulated CP is justifiable, because it’s dealing with potential harm to children (i.e., the imagery created might have an effect on perpetrators.)
However, it becomes a very slippery slope when we talk about limiting speech for other objectionable things, and while I’m just as opposed to rape as I am to CP, I can, for myself, see a slightly different place there. And then, where do you draw the line? There are a ton of “straight guys going gay” sites that have fantasies (or perhaps, in some cases, real situations) where a straight guy is coaxed, encouraged, or even coerced into doing things that he isn’t comfortable doing, and I don’t think that sends a positive message to viewers either (not to mention, to the extent the performers really are straight, possibly causing them psychological confusion). And then there’s the “guy drugged and taken advantage of” or “guy molested while he’s asleep” sites as well, yet you rarely hear anybody bitching about any of those sites.
I could argue that the fantasy of convincing a straight boy, as well as the fantasy of drugging or otherwise going after someone who isn’t conscious isn’t necessarily a positive and healthy message either.
It’s very complicated for me… I’m not in favor of banning straight-boy-goes-gay content, and while I’m not comfortable with rape content, and even some BDSM content, I’m not comfortable saying it should be banned either. And I feel the same way about bareback.
But even though I don’t particularly think that such content should be produced, I defend the right of people to do so.