feed sites

Re: feed sites

something else to consider - what is one’s legal responsibility for content posted by other feeds.

For example, what if I start publishing a feed from a site that featured hairy bears but then two months later switched over to promoting illegal content? Would I be held liable for the illegal content?

Also, if I monitor it daily is there a “reasonable” period of time the illegal content can be posted on my site without me getting in trouble? For instance, if I check the site every day at 3:00 PM and at 3:45 PM illegal content is fed to my site. I wouldn’t notice it for another 24 hours or so.

Re: feed sites

Well, don’t know about these things. I’d intend on getting feeds from paysites. I don’t know if paysites just suddenly put up illegal things, do they? I’m just trusting the sponsors I promote on my blog, for example, are all legal. Could be naive, but I think they all are and intend on being so. In other words, I’d get feeds for my blog/site from sponsors like that, without mentioning names in this post.

Re: feed sites

Ask yourself, does it sound too good to be true? To just put together a few feeds and never do anything again, just gets lots of cash?

Feed sites is a blog version of spam. I’ve never seen one that looks good or is even remotely entertaining. The text is normaly rubbish, the images are tiny and low quality and never fits the blogs. It’s all very random and ugly. As you mentioned it’s also pointless from SEO perspective, none of the post will ever be unique or listed in search engines.

I know lots of people run feed blogs but the honest truth is they are utter rubbish and surfers hate them. The only reason they exists are because people are to lazy to write their own blogs, crop images or upload videos.

If you want to make money on blogs you will need to spend time and hard work at it, it’s the only way. Just like anything else in business, there are no free and easy rides.

Re: feed sites

Bjorn, you’ve seen my older paintings, I tend to do everything the hard way, lol. :rolleyes: Just was curious and thanks for the reality test.

I spend a lot of time on my images so they look good, and overdo it. Same with SE, everything. So I am working on that, my workflow, not overdoing it, not easy but working on it.

I have to admit, going from painting to this, my fun time is working with images. That’s probably why I spend so much time fixing them up. Wish I could just do that period, but I’m sure I’d be too far slow for any company, unless they wanted some special retouching or whatever.

I like things to look good.

Re: feed sites

Didn’t mean to make that look like an advertisement.

Re: feed sites

I did look at setting up feed sites, so I’ve been there. But I asked myself would I enjoy surfing one of them? The answer is a BIG NO. I really don’t think anyone likes surfing a feed blog, they are so obviously not written by a person and surfers are pretty good at spotting them for what they are.

If you find you don’t have enough time for your blog, then just post less frequently. I doubt it would have a massive impact.

Re: feed sites

Thanks for your input, Bjorn. It’s always down to earth, simplified, to the point common sense, and that works just right with me.

Re: feed sites

There is room for both handwritten blogs and RSS-feed blogs, and yes, A LOT of sales come from RSS-feed blogs. As a matter of fact, I can personally tell you that a lot of my own blogs are RSS only, and they account for the majority of my blog sales.

When it comes down to it, it takes maybe an hour to get a WP blog skinned, RSS plugged in and then submitted to all the directories…if you simply ignore this as a marketing avenue, you are missing out on some potentially good sales.

Re: feed sites

[QUOTE=HunkMoneyLuke;70205]There is room for both handwritten blogs and RSS-feed blogs, and yes, A LOT of sales come from RSS-feed blogs. As a matter of fact, I can personally tell you that a lot of my own blogs are RSS only, and they account for the majority of my blog sales.

When it comes down to it, it takes maybe an hour to get a WP blog skinned, RSS plugged in and then submitted to all the directories…if you simply ignore this as a marketing avenue, you are missing out on some potentially good sales.[/QUOTE]

hmm, have to think about that. interesting discussion. glad I started the thread.

Re: feed sites

I think you’re going to find a lot of mixed feelings on RSS Feed blogs Tim. I tried it myself for a while and just couldn’t get many sales at all. I chose some of the best feeds around too.

That was just on a few blogs I set up specifically for this purpose. It didn’t work out for me at all. Hand written blog posts seem to do much, much better for me and that’s what I’ll stick with. I have 11 blogs, so it’s tough, but as Bjorn said, you have to work hard to reap financial rewards in this business.

Good luck with your decision - whatever it may be.

Re: feed sites

Thanks, Jeff, I need it. :slight_smile:

Re: feed sites

There is actually a specific term for feed blogs, SPLOGS… Spam Blogs.

No disrepect to Luke - who I adore :wink: - Remember even e-mail spam sells, if you just have enough of it. Volume always makes a difference. but in your case unless your intending to setup a big network of splogs you won’t make sales.

And no matter how you look at it, a feed site can never be anything other than spam. There is no human input, nothing new created, forever spewing out the same content already published in 1000s of places. I.E spam.

Re: feed sites

hehe…no disrespect taken, I rather enjoy these discussions!

I agree that a handwritten blog will normally always do better, but I am saying there is a place for both handwritten and RSS-feed blogs. And ignoring one of these may lead to missing some easy sales.

Also, just because you are using rss feeds it doesn’t necessarily mean its the same as content already published. Actually, I have gotten some pretty nice results with SEO and google by doing some simple morphing using Blogs Organizer, where I substitute common terms with the terms I am going after. The text is unique, its keyword loaded and ends up on the top search results for the specific words I am after.

I have also seen some great examples of splogs setup with directories such that the directory becomes a hub, filtering traffic to the appropriate sponsor-fed blog. Setting up this type of network is an easy way to generate bookmarkers and good quality filtered traffic.

Re: feed sites

Not written by person? Who the hell write that things? :wink:

HunkMoneyLuke - have right, some good sales come from rss blog but it is better to have unq handwritten blog post.

I run few rss blogs.

Re: feed sites

[QUOTE=inkognito;72439]Not written by person? Who the hell write that things? :wink:

HunkMoneyLuke - have right, some good sales come from rss blog but it is better to have unq handwritten blog post.

I run few rss blogs.[/QUOTE]

Spam also makes sales…

I simply meant that RSS blogs are not written by the blog owner and already used 10000s times on other blogs. From a surfers perspective RSS Blogs are as much fun as reading junk mail. Just look at www.bestmaleblogs.com, there isn’t as single RSS blog anywhere even close to the top positions.

Re: feed sites

Oh bull … I’m finding that statement to be offensive. The LAST thing I am is lazy. As to SEO – go punch in straight cocks on your google … go ahead, I’ll wait.

www.juststraightcocks.com is just ONE of my RSS fed blogs …

Re: feed sites

straight male cocks works too – but I’m only #2 with it.

One of my bestest online buddies writes morph blog feeds for sponsors. She supports herself, and two kids doing “hand written” posts, and a feed is probably the #1 tool affiliates are asking for these days, next to hosted flvs.

Re: feed sites

[QUOTE=Bec;72520]straight male cocks works too – but I’m only #2 with it.

One of my bestest online buddies writes morph blog feeds for sponsors. She supports herself, and two kids doing “hand written” posts, and a feed is probably the #1 tool affiliates are asking for these days, next to hosted flvs.[/QUOTE]

just curious, do you do any feed rewriting on your side or just use the feeds as in from the sponsor?

Re: feed sites

[QUOTE=Bec;72518]Oh bull … I’m finding that statement to be offensive. The LAST thing I am is lazy. As to SEO – go punch in straight cocks on your google … go ahead, I’ll wait.

www.juststraightcocks.com is just ONE of my RSS fed blogs …[/QUOTE]

Sorry I don’t mean to offend you, I’m sure you work very hard but you can’t deny that the majority of RSS Blogs are setup because people haven’t got the time or want to put in the effort to write their own content. But what value to surfers are you creating if you just republish the same stuff over and over and over again? Search engine traffic isn’t everything, you need bookmarkers to really grow a site.

As to SEO, your blog proves my point very well. You have only got 5 pages of your entire site indexed by Google, not a single individual post. 4 of those pages are a script pages that shouldn’t be indexed anyway. You’re getting on page 1 for the term “straight cock” because it’s a direct match to your domain name and it’s a fairly obscure (but well chosen) term. Not because of the content on your blog.

Re: feed sites

I agree with Bjorn. I played with an RSS fed blog last year and gave up. There just isn’t any point to it IMHO. I’ve attached a graphic showing how little traffic I got from search engines over nearly a year. Sure, I didn’t put up all that many posts, but the swings in traffic showed me the exercise was a bit pointless. Organic traffic should grow steadily not swing all over the place.

What Bec has going is apparently organic traffic on terms that are in her domain name. That’s not terribly hard to do - you don’t even need a site with content on it to accomplish that… Case and point I purchased the domain JaysonPark.com. JaysonPark.com doesn’t actually have any content on it. I just 301’d it to the page on my site that’s about Jason Park, and voila when you google Jayson Park you see JaysonPark.com as the display URL but the description is pulled off the text that’s on the page on rawtop.com. In other words, I get the number one slot for the search term, users think they’re going to JaysonPark.com, but they actually wind up at rawtop.com - and Google apparently likes it and I’m guessing owning JaysonPark.com strengthens my position on the search term Jayson Park. Now to accomplish that I did have to link to JaysonPark.com with the link text Jayson Park a few times, but that’s not nothing compared to managing a RSS fed blog, and I’m guessing because it’s redirected to a page with original content it will do better than it would as a splog.

That said, RSS feeds are useful - for automated tweets, for e-mails, and for extra content in a separate section of your site - just to keep people on your site and engaged. But you do it for the users, not for the search engines, and I never see the RSS portion as the primary purpose of the site. For example, I have a RSS-fed ‘new porn releases’ section on my discussion forum. It’s there just to keep the visitors amused while they’re waiting for something to happen on the site.

Screen shot 2010-07-19 at 9.24.15 AM.jpg