COPA officially deemed unconstitutional

WASHINGTON – The government lost its final attempt Wednesday to revive a federal law intended to protect children from sexual material and other objectionable content on the Internet.

The Supreme Court said it won’t consider reviving the Child Online Protection Act, which lower federal courts struck down as unconstitutional. The law has been embroiled in court challenges since it passed in 1998 and never took effect.

It would have barred Web sites from making harmful content available to minors over the Internet.

A federal appeals court in Philadelphia ruled that would violate the First Amendment, because filtering technologies and other parental control tools are a less restrictive way to protect children from inappropriate content online.

The act was passed the year after the Supreme Court ruled that another law intended to protect children from explicit material online — the Communications Decency Act — was unconstitutional.

The Bush administration had pressed the justices to take the case. They offered no comment on their decision to reject the government’s appeal.

Five justices who ruled against the Internet blocking law in 2004 remain on the court.

The case is Mukasey v. ACLU. 08-565.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_internet_blocking

Re: COPA officially deemed unconstitutional

I’m glad to see that some intelligent decisions are finally being made by the courts who realize that these odd pieces of legislation have no teeth, no plan and no intelligence behind them.

Realistically, a parent can easily protect their children from online content.

Even the RTA label which has been adopted by Safari, Firefox and IE as a great way to weed out adult material - it is build into the browser settings. The tools already exist, parents just have to educate themselves to use them.

This sort of poor legislation is just another example of parents refusing to take responsibility for their own child rearing.

I’ll never forget a friend of mine who asked HER SON to set up the v-chip on the tv. LOL! What kind of mother thinks that is the appropriate choice? Now, of course, he knows the password and watches all the “banned” tv he wants simply by entering the 4 digit code he entered into the system…

I’ve never bothered to explain this to her…

Is that bad?